The UN Security Council has made a significant move by passing a resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, marking the first time such a resolution has been adopted. This breakthrough occurred after the United States chose not to veto the resolution, a departure from its previous actions of vetoing similar efforts over the past five months.The resolution not only calls for a ceasefire but also demands the immediate release of all hostages held by Hamas, the group responsible for terrorist attacks against Israel since October 7. The resolution garnered support from 14 nations in the Security Council, with the United States abstaining from vetoing it despite Israel’s request not to do so.The adoption of this resolution is seen as a milestone moment at the United Nations Security Council, signalling a united effort to address the ongoing conflict in Gaza. However, Israel’s response to the resolution remains uncertain, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu cancelling a planned delegation to Washington DC following the Security Council’s decision.Israel’s defence minister, Yuav Galant, who is already in the US, has shown no indication of acknowledging the ceasefire call. This reluctance from Israel poses challenges to the resolution’s effectiveness in halting hostilities in Gaza.Many view the UN Security Council’s vote as a crucial step toward ending Israel’s actions in Gaza, but without full support from Israel, it may remain a symbolic gesture rather than a practical solution for peace in the region. The United States, as Israel’s primary ally, is urged to leverage its resources to facilitate a meaningful ceasefire agreement and address the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.Analysts expressed surprise at the swift tabling and passage of the ceasefire resolution, highlighting global consensus on key issues such as the need for a temporary ceasefire during Ramadan, the release of hostages, and the provision of humanitarian aid to Gaza.While the resolution is legally binding, its effectiveness depends on the willingness of both Israel and Hamas to adhere to its terms. Failure to comply could lead to diplomatic repercussions and further escalation of the conflict. While the UN Security Council’s resolution marks a significant development in efforts to address the Gaza conflict, its impact hinges on the actions of key stakeholders, particularly Israel and Hamas, in implementing and sustaining the ceasefire agreement.