Why Is Healthcare Failing in Conflict Zones and Remote Areas?

The impact of geopolitical issues on healthcare provision in conflict zones, tribal areas, deserts, and jungles.

Photo by on

Have you ever thought about why healthcare facilities are primarily concentrated in major cities? What is the necessity for a compulsory rural bond for medical students? Why can’t international stakeholders collaborate effectively during a health crisis?

Geopolitical issues significantly impact global health, leading to inequitable healthcare services and resources distribution, particularly in conflict zones, tribal areas, deserts, and jungles. These challenges are exacerbated by geopolitical determinants such as geography, governmental interests, and national policies. The health of residents and their access to healthcare facilities in these areas are profoundly affected by geopolitics, especially when these factors, alongside area-specific determinants, are overlooked during healthcare planning. For example, identifying violence as a key determinant in conflict-stricken areas is essential for tackling public health and public mental health challenges associated with violence.The dominance of Western knowledge in marginalized countries is counterproductive when local issues are neglected. By citing the example of the COVID-19 pandemic – one may argue – that during the pandemic, surveillance and testing transcended national boundaries; however, remote geographies remained unaware of the resources available and necessary precautions to be taken. Additionally, the lack of equitable resource distribution forced people in these regions to travel long distances for healthcare, highlighting broader issues of global health inequity.Whenever war breaks out, people suffer physically and mentally. Basic needs such as proper sanitation, clean drinking water, hygienic food, and safe sleeping conditions are often unmet in war-torn areas. This creates fertile ground for epidemic outbreaks, further exacerbated by inadequate healthcare services. For example, recent polio outbreaks in Pakistan and Afghanistan illustrate how war and political instability can lead to a public health crisis.The impact of war is not confined to the immediate conflict zones but also ripples out to neighbouring countries. Increasing migration rates drive up demand for resources, leading to price inflation for even basic products. The World Health Organization (WHO) has faced criticism for relying on earmarked funding, which limits its autonomy and raises questions about its effectiveness during health crisis. Originally established to support crisis-stricken countries, WHO’s role has been compromised by geopolitics, worsening global healthcare inequities.In remote and marginalized areas such as tribal, hilly, forest, and desert regions, the diversity of cultures and practices poses additional challenges to healthcare delivery. A one-size-fits-all approach is insufficient for addressing the many disparities these communities face, potentially leading to rejection of modern medicine and avoidance of seeking healthcare when needed. A comprehensive approach is needed, including strict resource allocation, presence of healthcare professionals on-site, connectivity systems, and integration of modern and traditional medicine practices.Traditional medicine systems like Ayurveda offer valuable insights that can be adapted for these communities. Ayurveda emphasizes the use of natural resources for healing and well-being. Educating tribal communities about such systems can empower them to manage their healthcare using culturally relevant practices.However, one of the most significant challenges in improving healthcare in remote areas is the reluctance of healthcare professionals to work there. This reluctance stems from a lack of resources, inadequate facilities, and resistance from communities that prioritize traditional medicine. To combat this issue, various states have introduced incentives for professionals willing to serve in these areas, and mandatory rural service bonds for medical graduates and postgraduates help ensure that these regions are not neglected. Organizations have been taking efforts to inspire medical students to serve in remote areas through camps, national meetings, and research projects, cultivating a sense of responsibility and interest in addressing the needs of marginalized populations.Despite these initiatives, a multifaceted approach is still necessary to overcome the shortcomings of decentralized healthcare. Collaboration among stakeholders, cultural sensitivity, and the integration of traditional healing practices are crucial for effective and culturally appropriate healthcare delivery. The Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI), 1988, is a successful example of such an approach.The ultimate aim of global health is the equitable distribution of resources. However, geopolitics often plays an antithetical role, turning global health into a game of knowledge, power, and economic sharing among nations. Sharing knowledge across borders can create opportunities for research and the advocacy of new practices. This, in turn, can make healthcare delivery systems more efficient and effective through a trial-and-error approach. Sharing power among nations can reduce competition between them and foster collaborative efforts to address common health challenges. This can also strengthen governance mechanisms, promoting the equitable distribution of health resources.Sharing economic resources eases the financial burden on the native governments. International collaboration can play a vital role in the equitable allocation of resources. However, there is limited evidence on how foreign aid should be distributed more equitably and effectively. Stakeholders often become engrossed in geopolitical power struggles, leading to the neglect of marginalized communities and exacerbating disparities in healthcare delivery. Without proper resource allocation and funding, the burden increases on the healthcare delivery systems, resulting in them functioning inefficiently.In light of these challenges, there is a pressing need for a periodic revision of budget allocations and policies to reduce disparities in healthcare access and outcomes. Incorporating geopolitical context into the delivery and design of healthcare training materials is one-way health practitioners can better understand and address these complex issues, informing policy advocacy and helping to identify the most effective levers for change.In conclusion, the intersection of politics and global health presents both challenges and opportunities. While geopolitical factors can hinder the equitable distribution of healthcare resources, a collaborative, culturally sensitive, and multifaceted approach can help overcome these barriers. By integrating modern and traditional practices, sharing knowledge and resources, and revising policies to address current needs, the global health community can work towards achieving its ultimate goal: equitable healthcare for all.