베팅의신 안전한 카지노사이트 보증업체 먹튀검증；토토먹튀블러드

카지노사이트 씨큐9-cq9-gaming；카지노；카지노사이트킴

BlockchainX — Wed, 23 Oct 2024 22:25:15 GMT

Factors to Consider When Selecting a Blockchain for Your Meme Coin

Meme coins have become very popular, often thanks to social media and community support. While the excitement can be contagious, the success of a meme coin relies heavily on the blockchain it uses. Choosing the right blockchain is important because it affects how fast transactions happen, the costs involved, security, and how well the coin functions. This blog will cover the key factors to think about when selecting a blockchain for your meme coin.

1. Transaction Speed

Transaction speed is crucial for meme coins. When people want to buy or sell quickly, they need fast transactions. If the blockchain is slow, users may get frustrated and lose interest.Different blockchains work at different speeds. For example, blockchains like Solana and Binance Smart Chain (BSC) can handle a lot of transactions in a short time. In contrast, slower blockchains might struggle during busy times, leading to delays. Picking a blockchain that can process transactions quickly can keep your community engaged and excited.

2. Transaction Costs

Cost matters when . If transaction fees are too high, people may be discouraged from buying or selling, especially if they want to make small trades.Look for blockchains that offer low transaction fees. Binance Smart Chain is known for its affordable fees, while Ethereum has been criticized for high gas fees. By analyzing the fees of different blockchains, you can find one that makes trading easy for users.

3. Security Features

Security is vital in the cryptocurrency world. When choosing a blockchain for your meme coin, consider its security features. Strong security protects your coin from hacks and fraud, helping to build trust within your community.Research the security history of potential blockchains. Blockchains like Bitcoin and Ethereum have solid security, but they use a lot of energy. Newer blockchains, like Cardano, are energy-efficient and still secure. Evaluating a blockchain’s security will help ensure your project stays safe.

Get an email whenever BlockchainX publishes.

4. Community Support and Development

A strong community can significantly impact the success of your meme coin. An active developer community means better support and more opportunities for innovation.Choosing a blockchain with an engaged community can enhance your project’s visibility. For instance, Ethereum has a large developer ecosystem, which can help you find partners and resources. Joining forums or engaging on social media can give you insights into the community surrounding a potential blockchain.

5. Ecosystem and Compatibility

The existing ecosystem of a blockchain is essential. Some blockchains support many applications and projects, providing opportunities for your meme coin to grow.Compatibility with other platforms can facilitate partnerships and collaborations, which are vital for marketing your coin. If you plan to connect your meme coin with decentralized finance (DeFi) projects or NFT marketplaces, choose a blockchain that supports these features.

6. Scalability

The scalability of a blockchain therefore relates to how well a blockchain can manage expansions. It enhances usability, the network should handle more users and transactions by improving your meme coin without any lag.If a blockchain cannot scale, then it will be slow during high traffic and the fees on these blocks will be very high. Compare the scalability solutions on different blockchains that can be used to increase the capacity without decreasing the speed, for instance, layer-2 solutions or sharding.

7. Regulatory Compliance

Crypto regulation was already a crucial topic, but in these recent years, it became even more crucial to understand all these regulations. Your meme coin is legal tender in one blockchain may not be in the other since legal requirements vary from one country to another.The legal structure of a blockchain must also be researched to follow all the legal requirements in the target markets. It can also ensure no future encounters with the law and add to the believability of the project in question for you as an individual, and as a company.

8. Token Standards

If you are , examine the token standards on the respective blockchain. Our short overview of Ethereum own tokens’ standards, ERC-20 is probably the most popular example followed by BEP-20 standing for Binance Smart Chain.Selecting a blockchain with a popular token standard allows integrating with wallets, exchanges, platforms, and others easily. This accessibility is crucial in making certain that the users are capable of trading and to purchase or to invest in your meme coin with ease.

9. Future Development Plans

Specifically, it is necessary to consider the further development prospects of the selected blockchain. A particularly promising line of development is a dynamic blockchain that undergoes periodic upgrades.The best blockchains should have plans and strategies that are centered on refining the experience for the users as well as improvement on the technologies available. FFor example, Ethereum has a roadmap focused on making it more scalable and efficient, which could benefit your project in the long run.

10. Interoperability

Interoperability implies that not only individual blockchain can function but that various blockchain can connect and interact. This feature can be very useful in the success of your meme coin since it enables the various interactions as well as trade to happen across different platforms.Another factor to consider when selecting a blockchain for hosting your meme coin is whether it can interoperate with other chains or is connected to another chain, the selection of such a blockchain will make your project appealing to users.

Conclusion

Selecting the right blockchain for your meme coin is a crucial decision that can impact your project’s success. By considering factors like transaction speed, costs, security, community support, scalability, and regulatory compliance, you can make an informed choice.The right blockchain will provide a solid foundation for , fostering community engagement and ensuring smooth operations. As the crypto world continues to change, staying updated on blockchain technologies will help you adapt and succeed.

Factors to Consider When Selecting a Blockchain for Your Meme Coin was originally published in Predict on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

베트남 카지노 추천；온카패스- 온라인 카지노 사이트

Riddhi — Wed, 23 Oct 2024 22:25:08 GMT

Roughly 537 million people worldwide have diabetes

Continue reading on Predict »

돌직구벳 안전한 카지노사이트 보증업체 먹튀검증；토토먹튀블러드

BlockchainX — Wed, 23 Oct 2024 22:25:01 GMT

Emerging Trends New Crypto Tokens | BlockchainX Explain

Introduction:

The volatility of the cryptocurrency market has always existed, starting from the Bitcoin-only era till the Ethereum and altcoin eras. However, with the last few years bearing the recent upsurge of production whereby a majority of those tokens can serve diverse purposes in DeFi, gaming, and NFTs, This article outlines the prevailing developments concerning these tokens. It clearly elucidates how this trend has grown in a short time and the reasons that have contributed to this growth. BlockchainX Explain Simple and Useful to you,Read it out.

Rise of utility tokens

Many of New tokens come out nowadays, the majority of which are utility tokens designed to enhance the functioning of certain ecosystems in dApps. These tokens, unlike so many cryptocurrencies, are valuable not only because they can be bought and held speculation, but also because they can be used on the relevant platforms. For example in DeFi, tokens like AAVE or UNI allow their owners to participate in governance, staking, lending, or providing liquidity through pools.In the realm of gaming however, titles such as Axie Infinity (AXS) or Sandbox (SAND) show that the tokens can serve a dual purpose as an in-game currency with a bearing on game play and also provide an opportunity for persons to earn money in the course of engaging with that game.

Meme coins and hype tokens

A wide range of meme coins has recently flooded the crypto market thanks in particular to the promotion through social networks. Though launched as a meme coin, Dogecoin (DOGE) has grown exponentially in value thanks to the likes of Elon Musk, who has popularized the coin. Many clones of this token have made an appearance, tokens that are as comedic and nonsensical as the Shiba Inu (SHIB) or even PepeCoin (PEPE) which are generally fun tokens thanks to the available community.Nevertheless, even with the numerous meme tokens, a clear impact that this has on the crypto market is its susceptibility to price changes. And for those who are caught in between, the medication works like say rockets in the sky whose tokens can explode into existence in a matter of seconds, they can just as well implode in the same timeframe leaving some of the investors nursing heavy losses.

Read our Blog about to

The NFT and gaming token boom

Just as futures and options contracts have their own unique sets of instruments, the sphere of tokens also booms with the introduction of non-fungible tokens. An NFT or a non-fungible token, in its simplest form, could be understood to mean a digital reproduction of any subsequently owned art, music, or virtual items in computer games, in particular, a token that permits its holder to claim ownership of anything. Therefore, new tokens claim connection with the NFT market places and provide a set up in which the users of the token can twist or interchange art and other collectible objects. For example, the OpenSea and Rarible marketplaces and Decentraland have their tokens to enable users intending to develop an equitable marketplace to benefit from sharing the marketplace.Moreover, the so-called play to earn gaming where players earn tokens among other monetary incentives for engaging in activities has increased the value of tokens like AXS, SAND, and GALA. Gaming tokens have been a hit in particular for users looking for a fun and profit-oriented experience which is provided by such platforms.

DeFi tokens and yield farming

Growth prospects in the cryptocurrency market are very high and expected in the area known as decentralized finance (DeFi). The large number of projects aiming to create new DeFi tokens in the market, each presenting a different purpose such as token staking, token liquidity provision, and token yield earning. New generation DeFi platforms such as Uniswap, PancakeSwap, Compound have issued their own tokens: UNI, CAKE, and COMP accordingly, which provides voting as well as profit-sharing opportunities to the users.Yield farming is among the common practices within this space where investors move their tokens from one platform to another in a bid to maximize returns. It is indeed very rewarding but there is a monkey’s paw to it, especially when such a grounded investing strategy is applied on young and unproven centers that are easy to hack or be accessed illegally in any other way.

Layer 2 tokens and scalability solutions

As a result of the emergence of other smart contract platforms or Ethereum itself, scalability is becoming a big challenge. Systems such as Polygon (MATIC), Arbitrum, and Optimism, which are known as Layer 2 scaling solutions, have also been developed to ease the congestion of the Ethereum network by lessening the cost and volume of transactions. A few of the Layer 2 platforms offer their own tokens or the payment of transactions as well as the validators is addressed.Those token types existed in response to the enhanced performance of the blockchain and the growth of decentralized applications.

Regulation and security concerns

Another reason why regulators and government institutions are concerned about ICOs is the proliferation of various types of coins and its rapid growth. Today, ICOs are the hottest subject matter for most countries and Regulatory Agencies. This is because its something new that is prone to legal problems as well as fraud or scams. Additionally, the rise in popularity of decentralized platforms brings with it the need for consumer protection since ICOs make use of more volatile and potentially fraudulent devices known as ‘tokens’ that promise investors returns.With newer tokens, security remains a concern given the numerous cases of hacks and exploits. Lastly, it is envisaged that the market will further expand and grow, and only those token projects that have tight security systems, and properly account for their operations will be able to thrive — other projects may stagnate either because of regulatory interventions or due to the lack of confidence among the people.

Sustainability and long-term viability

There is a growing opinion in the crypto economy of today that the only available items on offer are new tokens and their respective investment schemes, which promise extremely high returns. It appears that the current strong focus on delivering the intended products by sound teams with active community backing, will give such projects better chances of longevity in the future. This transition will probably mark the beginning of a new era where the current free-for-all market orientation gives way to useful purpose, as more and more investors are vigilant about utility rather than hyperbole.

Read out our Blog about:

Conclusion

Lastly, given the persistent evolution of trends in crypto tokens, it is crucial for both individuals and organizations to keep abreast of these changes. At , we focus on the creation of modern projects involving crypto tokens in accordance with the current tendencies. And if you want to create your own standard ERC-20, or BEP-20, or other interesting token standards, we will help you with this. Join hands with BlockchainX now and execute your ideas in the dynamic cryptocurrency space today.

Emerging Trends New Crypto Tokens | BlockchainX Explain was originally published in Predict on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

뱅크카지노；보증업체；온카패스- 온라인 카지노 사이트

BlockchainX — Wed, 23 Oct 2024 22:24:55 GMT

Tokenization of bonds is a recent financial informatics breakthrough that is changing the entire outlook of debt instruments. Bond tokenization allows reforming the conventional form of bonds into digital assets through the application of blockchain technology. This makes such instruments more efficient, transparent and liquid. This guide will discuss bond tokenization in detail including its benefits, how it is done, related policies, and the outlook of bond tokenization in the world crafted financial markets.

Guide to Bond Tokenization

What is Bond Tokenization?

As the name suggests, tokenization of bonds implies that digital bonds in a form of a token are issued against the existing traditional paper bonds on the blockchain technology or other distributed ledger technologies. Such asset backed tokens are issued digitally and can almost enhance the ownership experience of a bond buy, sell and trade it like any other asset on a blockchain infrastructure.To put it simply, tokenized bonds are ordinary bonds that have been turned into digital tokens. Each token embodies the very same rights and responsibilities as its traditional form: interest payments, maturity dates, and repaying the principle amount.

The Role of Blockchain

Tokenization of bonds would not be achieved without the use of blockchain technology, which allows the establishment of a decentralised and unchangeable central record for any and all transactions of the related tokens. This is beneficial for any financial markets as it enhances safety, clarity and ability to track the transactions. Smart contracts may be used to facilitate various functions related to the bonds, such as spearing interest payments or redemption, thereby minimizing the need for third parties.

Traditional Bonds vs. Tokenized Bonds

In one case, the bonds are issued, traded, or simply managed through an intermediary infrastructure that is mostly centralized, such as banks, brokers, and custodians. In another instance, tokenized bonds are created on a distributed ledger technology platform, and transfers and ownership are carried out solely via DLT. Consequently, this leads to a number of benefits; for instance, higher efficiency and liquidity, and better accessibility.

How Bond Tokenization Works

Token Creation

The very first step in the bond tokenization process entails creating digital tokens that represent an ownership stake in a bond. Such tokens are then associated with the blockchain and issued based on certain guidelines, usually ERC-20 (Ethereum) and other similar blockchains. The bond issuer may engage in making the tokens or a tokenization service provider may help in issuing the tokens.

Smart Contracts

A smart contract is a contract that triggers some action when certain conditions are met, with the terms of the contract coded into programmable scripts. With regards to tokenized bonds, smart contracts can be employed in the execution of the following functions:

Interest distribution: Dispensing interest amounts to bondholders in form of tokens at specified times without human intervention.
Maturity and redemption: Reinstitution of the principal amount at the end of the bond’s term or maturity without any manual undertakings.
Corporate actions: Executing actions such as re-purchase of bonds or re-financing.

Custody and Security

Typically, the custody of tokenized bonds requires a solid solution and is often associated with digital wallets or institutional-grade custodians with a focus on storing digital assets. Security measures include the use of encryption, multi-signature wallets, and cold storage techniques that are deployed to secure the tokens from hacking and other cyber risks.

Secondary Markets

The most prominent benefit of bond tokenization is that it allows for the trading of such tokenized bonds in secondary markets thus enhancing liquidity. Just like any traditional bonds, holders of bond tokens may sell their bond tokens in secondary markets through digital exchanges or over-the-counter OTC services. In this way, tokenization opens the bond markets to access by the smaller investors fitting in with their needs who would otherwise have been shut out except for maybe few larger financial institutions due to economically unattainable rates.

Benefits of Bond Tokenization

Increased Liquidity

Conventional bonds are often illiquid and challenging to trade, particularly in small amounts. This is due to the restrictions in liquidity. This is resolved through Bond tokenization as it enables fractional ownership in which investors can exchange bonds in divided shares on secondary markets increasing the liquidity of the asset.

Reduced Transaction Costs

The non-centralized system of Blockchain technology prevents the need for a lot of the bond issuance, trading and settlement agents like brokers, custodians and clearing houses. As a result, without these intermediaries, bond tokenization cuts the total cost of transactions and improves the effectiveness of the bond market.

Greater Accessibility

Bond tokenization causes the bond markets to include more investors such as retail ones by reducing the entry limits. One can purchase tokens in small quantities hence having access to people who couldn’t invest in the conventional bond markets because of prohibitive minimum investment requirements.

Transparency and Security

In the case of tokenized bonds as well, blockchain’s distributed ledger technology guarantees the proper and transparent recording of all transactions carried out. The investors can view the record of bond owners and other important details on the bond issued system, thus creating more confidence in the system.

Faster Settlement

Settling bonds following conventional methods, especially in cross border transactions, takes several days. However, the accelerates the process; in many instances the transaction settling takes place within a few minutes or even seconds due to the speed and efficiency of the blockchain.

Use Cases of Bond Tokenization

Government Bonds

Across the globe, governments are in the process of evaluating the possible issuance of bonds via tokenization. Government bonds are considered the most prominent source of financing. And new financial instruments such as Bonds 2.0 might enable authorities to fundraise more and attract more investors. Moreover, the Philippines and Thailand have already gone ahead to issue tokenized government bonds.

Corporate Bonds

Bond tokenization has the potential to enhance firm’s capital market access. Corporates can create and market tokenized corporate bonds with an enhanced level of operational efficiency minimizing the time, cost, and difficulties associated with the traditional bond issuance costs and improving the functioning order of the corporate bond market.

Green Bonds

Lately, the green bonds (the bonds that are being issued for the purpose which is towards a productive environment enhancement) have been in serious demand and thus their issuance has been on the rise. In addition, there is the assurance of better control through use of green bond tokenization which gives confidence to the investors and promote the green financial activities.

Real Estate Bonds

Real estate development companies typically fund development projects through the issuance of bonds. The bonds can be tokenized also which enables the real estate companies to sell the fractional stakes to many investors. This is common for huge investments which require intensive funding at the beginning.

The Future of Bond Tokenization

Expansion of Tokenized Markets

Though still in its infancy in comparison to the traditional bond market, it is possible to predict the aggressive proliferation of the bond tokenization approach to the financial markets as the technology encapsulating blockchain advances. More and more governments and corporate entities are expected to embrace issuing bonds in a tokenized form for the purpose of raising resources, whereas more digital exchanges will create a market for the secondary trading of tokenized resources.

Integration with Decentralized Finance (DeFi)

Tokenized Bonds can also help in fashioning the DeFi sector which is presently one of the most explosive areas under the blockchain umbrella. With tokenized bonds in place, the investor will also be able to participate in other access to services and products such as decentralized lending, borrowing, and even yield farming.

Global Standardization

Bond Tokenization’s biggest roadblock is definitely the lack of a single global standard to govern all jurisdictions. We may venture to presume, however, that in the coming years as the industry grows, the focus on such matters will increase to a degree where businesses will be able to issue and trade tokenized bonds without resorting to the matter of geography.

Retail Investor Participation

Increased tokenization, which reduces the barriers of entry towards bond markets, will increase the participation of retail investors in bond offers. The bond market however remains fragmented in that more investors can not easily access fixed income products that some may have deems them or their organizations to have not been accessible within the market.

Conclusion

is an ingenious development in the financial sector and it comes with a myriad of advantages such as improved liquidity, transparency and efficiency. Though technical, regulatory and market barriers still exist, there is a bright future ahead for bond tokenization. Provided the necessary infrastructure and legal guidelines are available, bonds in a token format may become commonplace in international financial markets which would radically change the issuance and circulation of debt instruments. It can be anticipated that the importance of bond tokenization will increase with the progression of technologies such as blockchain.

The Complete Guide to Bond Tokenization was originally published in Predict on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

코리안 스피드 바카라 소개 및 특징；라이브바카라사이트 추천

Sachin pandit — Wed, 23 Oct 2024 22:24:43 GMT

#4. Colorectal cancer screening

Continue reading on Predict »

프라그마틱 정품 구별；바카라 게임- 온라인 카지노 사이트

Rudi Widiyanto — Wed, 23 Oct 2024 22:19:12 GMT

Welcome to the Planet Axioma

Continue reading on Predict »

이트

That Guy, Noah — Wed, 23 Oct 2024 22:19:03 GMT

Yuri Levada In 2005, Predicted Russia’s Future.

Continue reading on Predict »

바카라 온카패스 oncapass.com 온라인카지노 기본 규칙 설명

Asmund Frost — Wed, 23 Oct 2024 22:18:54 GMT

Applying Dawkins Probability Test on the Historical Jesus — Reworked

Would it be possible to put a probability on the existence of the historical Jesus using Dawkins 7-grade scale as a framework?

Jesus from Nazareth is perhaps the most famous and influential person in history. Regardless of religious beliefs almost everyone has heard of the central figure of Christianity and billions of people acknowledge him as either Messiah, Christ, spiritual leader, sorcerer, prophet or a prolific exorcist that walked the Earth some 2000 years ago.But despite this there is no scientific evidence that Jesus ever existed and the sources of information are all written decades after his execution. Considering the above, would it still be possible to put a probability on the existence of the historical Jesus using Dawkins 7-grade scale as a framework? Let’s give it a try!Dawkins’ spectrum of theistic probability (as made famous in The God Delusion) is a way to categorize the probability of the existence of God by making this a scientific hypothesis like any other. The two extremes on the scale represent the opposite certainties: I know there is a God (1) and I know there is no God (7).First of all we need to make a few assumptions to make this work.

The first assumption is that we must leave out the extremes on the scale, i.e. from a historical (and logical) point of view we will not be able to prove that Jesus did exist or didn’t exist with a 100% certainty. The antipodes belong to the believers! This leaves us with 2–6 on the scale:

2 It is very probable that the historical Jesus existed

3 It is probable that the historical Jesus existed

4 It is equally probable that the historical Jesus existed that he did not exist

5 It is improbable that the historical Jesus existed

6 It is very improbable that the historical Jesus existed

The second assumption is that we cannot treat this case like a 21th century murder trial and conclude that DNA is missing, and hence we can make no conclusions. This is about rewinding history and make assumptions and come up with probabilities, based on everything we know today about the case.

The third assumption is that this is about the historical Jesus only and not about the divine Christ or the Jewish Messiah and not about the miracles or the resurrection. Hence we can leave aside the theological part of the discussion and focus on whether Jesus from Nazareth did exist at all.

The fourth assumption is that it is necessary to go back in time and try to envision what it was like to live in Galilee, Judea and Samaria around the first century. The turmoil and conflicts at the time and place where people like Jesus grew up shaped the attitude and perception of contemporary religious Movements. For this apprehension the bible is pretty much useless but there are plenty of Jewish, Greek and Roman sources as well as archeological findings and existing places and buildings.

Jerusalem and the Temple of Herod around the time of Jesus

The fifth assumption is that we also need to wind back the evolution of Christianity. It is necessary to bear in mind that Christianity is a translated religion that has evolved and divided into branches for 2000 years. This means that rituals, traditions, cultural diversities, names and the interpretation of metaphorical terms have changed over time and together with the diversion of the church.

The sixth assumption is that much of what has been said about Jesus (or what Jesus supposedly said himself) in the biblical texts must be considered as post-constructions by the dawning Christian movement. These texts have little interest in describing the historical person behind the myths (or the chronology and historicity of events). They are biased for obvious reasons and written by people who never met Jesus, in a different language and with the main purpose to let the reincarnation of Jesus promote Christianity. Hence these details are of no interest or relevance here, only the basic facts.

The seventh assumption is that the historical Jesus cannot have been a well-known person while he was still alive considering the lack of historical evidence. He didn’t gain any political influence during his life time and he didn’t form Christianity. The claim that he was executed in Jerusalem is assumed to have been ”a precaution” in order to ensure peace during the crowded pilgrim festivals (Pesach) rather than something that was absolutely necessary.

The eight and final assumption is that we have to brush aside all the relics associated with Jesus. According to the famous theologian John Calvin all the alleged relics from Jesus would “make a shipload”. The most famous examples are the Shroud of Turin, the Sudarium of Oviedo, the Image of Edessa, wood chips from the cross, holy nails, the “lead codices”, sacred scrolls, the Crown of Thorns, the instruments of the passion, the Holy Prepuce and the Holy Grail. So far none of them have proved to be authentic.

Jordan Lead Codices

All these assumptions formulates a framework and definition of the probability test. In short we have concluded that we are only looking at the historicity and not the divinity of Jesus, we will not be able to conclude anything with a 100% certainty and we cannot use the shiploads of relics as evidence, we need to understand what it was like to live 2000 years ago in Palestine and that Christianity of today has evolved and divided and been translated into other languages during the same period. We also have to picture a local religious sect leader from Galilee going into Jerusalem with his small group of followers during the crowded pilgrim festivals.So, let’s look deeper into the first-century Palestine that was occupied by the Roman empire. People in general were poor and illiterate, life was hard and dangerous and one could expect to die young. Only a minority experienced their 25th birthday. Jesus was over 30 when he supposedly started his operation and around 35–40 when he was crucified, which means that he was older than most people.Instead of the images we are used to see in the western world in which Jesus Christ is often portrayed with light skin, light brown hair, blue eyes and the gentle smile with white teeth we now have to picture a more realistic and historical figure. Imagine a relatively short and broad-faced, ageing man with olive skin and dark hair and with almost no teeth remaining in his mouth.

Model by Richard Neave for BBC

The historical Jesus was likely an illiterate woodworker who left his home and (inspired by contemporary people such as John the Baptist) started his own ministry as a healer and exorcist and preaching about God and the new kingdom soon to come. This drifting healer did most certainly not listen to the name of “Jesus” which is a transliteration in several steps during 2000 year of Christian evolution. It is more likely that his real name was “Yeshua” (which is an actual Aramaic name) but no one knows for sure.According to historical documents the first century Palestine was a chaotic and deeply religious place. The country had been thrown into a long period of political turmoil, violence and religious disorder ever since the death of King Herod the Great. During this period of religious unrest, wandering self-proclaimed prophets, rabbis, healers and sect leaders were a common phenomenon. Some examples are Honi the Circle-Drawer, Hanina ben Dosa, Johanan ben Zakkai, the hermit Bannus, John the Baptist, Theudas and the Jewish revolt leader the Egyptian.In other words, a figure such as Jesus was not an anomaly but rather a product of his time, someone that looked, dressed, talked and believed like most other non-roman people around him. An insignificant and harmless sect leader with a small group of followers and of no particular interest to the provincial authorities.So what does the written evidence of Jesus’ existence tell us?

The four Gospels by Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are the main theological sources. In addition we have the epistles of St Paul and secondary gospels such as Peter and James. As for Jewish theology, “Jesus the Nazarene” is mentioned in several different passages in Talmud. Non-Christian contemporary sources such as Josephus and Tacitus also mention Jesus. Furthermore there are indirect references made by Pliny the Younger, Suetonius and by the Stoic philosopher Mara bar Serapion.

As of today there is no information about the original sources of the theological scriptures, but at some point the oral traditions must have been put down in text. The four Gospels are written anonymously and are assumed to be based on two main sources (Mark and unknown source “Q”). This is the “Two-source Hypothesis” in which Q is assumed to be a written source and that may have been derived from multiple independent oral and written accounts.Other theological sources, such as Paul’s letters, are also independent from this. It should be noted that, at the time of Jesus, only about 3% of the Jews were literate. The disciples were low-class Aramaic-speaking rural peasants and would most likely not have been able to craft the Gospels in Greek.The first-century Roman-Jewish historian Josephus makes references to both John the Baptist, Jesus and James (the brother of Jesus). Josephus was a well-connected aristocrat and military leader in Galilee during the first Jewish revolt against Rome 66–70BC. He was around when the early church was getting started and it is likely that he knew people who had seen and heard Jesus.It is often assumed among scholars that Roman sources are generally independent from non-Roman (Jewish) sources and that the similarities and differences between various sources can be used in the authentication process. But it cannot be ruled out that the texts about Jesus are theological post-constructions or that the information comes from Christians. The only common events that are mentioned in both theological and in non-theological documents are that Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist and later crucified by the order of the Roman Prefect Pontius Pilate.The existence of Pontius Pilate is confirmed by Christian scriptures and non-theological documents as well as late archeological findings from the 1960s. In 1990 the remains of Josef bin Kajafas (Caiaphas) were found in a family tomb outside Jerusalem. It is believed to belong to the high priest that wanted to sentence Jesus to death and consequently sent him to Pilate.

The Caiaphas Ossuary

Looking at the gospels they provide descriptions that harmonize with the culture and geography of first-century Palestine. For example we know that crucifixion was a common execution method at the time, especially around the Pilgrim Festivals when massive crowds seized Jerusalem for several days. We also know that archaeologists have been able to confirm the existence of ancient Nazareth as well as more than 50 persons mentioned in the Bible.The original sources (written or spoken, Aramaic or Greek) that later evolved into letters, epistles, gospels must have appeared while there were witnesses still alive (witnesses as in family, followers, disciples, Romans and Jews visiting the Passover etc). Whatever was passed on as stories and myths during the first apostolic years in Jerusalem, whether in text or words, could be challenged and questioned.When it comes to the key events (the baptism and the execution) it would likely be more difficult to sustain a somewhat consistent story over time if there was no real person behind it. A coherent story based completely on mythisicm could be difficult to uphold in the area where the story was supposed to have unfolded.The mythicist alternative suggests that Paul the Apostle based Christianity on a Judaized version of Mystery cults, which were common in the very religious first century Palestine. Paul might have been teaching the theological concept with heavenly visions and revelations of the risen Christ. Like other heavenly beings, an allegorical story was then formed around this Jesus Christ.The story was then traded within a local church, where Jesus was ascribed a life on Earth with family, friends and enemies, deeds and a doctrine. Future generations of worshipers came to perceive this created story as a story of something that had really happened. The early cults might have had different levels of initiation, where the lowest levels weren’t trusted with the deepest secrets of the inner circles, allowing the myth to spread.This would basically mean that a trusted group of people would have to agree on a story and dedicate their whole lives to this narrative. This is not impossible of course but a real person would provide a much easier explanation.It is also difficult to understand why religious writers would invent such a figure in the heart of the roman empire at a time where there was strong suspicion of Judaism. It is even more difficult to understand why the different writers would depict the many embarrassments and failures of the Messiah (for example he was baptized as a disciple and humiliated and executed like a criminal).Some of these “flaws” have seemingly been corrected in the gospels to better fit with the contemporary image of the Messiah, one such example is the desperate and inconsistent attempt to explain how the birthplace of the Nazarene was actually in Bethlehem — like the birthplace of the Davidian Messiah.It is also worth mentioning that some of the alleged central events were only witnessed by the least credible persons in patriarchal Palestine — a group of women! If you are going to make up the whole story from scratch, and with the contemporary audience as the main target group, wouldn’t it be more credible to use male witnesses? And why bother messing with genealogies and birth narratives unless there is something that needs to be corrected or explained?

Under any circumstances it is a fact that something triggered a new and fast-growing movement, creating a lot of activity in first century Palestine (the gatherings in Jerusalem, the missionary journeys, the imprisonments and execution of the disciples, all the gospels, epistles and letters written with all the flaws and corrections and interpretations, the disputes among the apostles, all the founded communities and churches, all the people involved from the very beginning and willing to give up their lifes to spread the message).

All this combined suggest that the most straightforward scenario would be that Jesus from Nazareth actually lived and died, rather than being a myth or post-construction by the early Christian movement. I.e. a core of historical truth based on an actual human being, but which bears very little resemblance to the divine Jesus of our imaginations.

If so, he was just one of many sect leaders and prophets of the Apostolic age. From an historical point of view there was nothing unique about him. He was not an anomaly, rather a product of his time.

Considering all of the above it is simply more likely that there was a real person that inspired the Christian movement than a myth or invention. In conclusion I’ll give it a 3 on the Dawkins scale: it is likely that the historical Jesus existed, but not saying anything else about him other than that he existed as a real person. This also seems to be the generally accepted view among historians and scholars regardless of religious beliefs.

Applying Dawkins Probability Test on the Historical Jesus — Reworked was originally published in Predict on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

루피 카지노；소닉 카지노；라바 카지노

srgg6701 — Wed, 23 Oct 2024 22:18:46 GMT

Learn it to overcome

Continue reading on Predict »

텐텐벳 안전한 토토사이트 10x10bet 보증업체 먹튀검증；토토먹튀블러드

Dr. Brian Glassman — Wed, 23 Oct 2024 02:21:21 GMT

Tesla’s Haters & Fans’ Perspectives: The Company That Divides — A Balanced View

By Dr. Brian Glassman

Your Feedback Is Appreciated

I value your feedback and encourage you to engage by clapping, bookmarking, or commenting to help shape the authors future content. Your support is greatly appreciated. Further, this is not investing advice.

Tesla’s Fans and Critics about to Brawl

Where It Started

It is remarkable that Tesla, an American automotive company, has cultivated such a passionate fan base (), while simultaneously generating equally strong negative sentiment from its critics (). This polarization is distinct from traditional automotive rivalries, such as the Ford vs. GM competition among truck enthusiasts, which were largely driven by marketing efforts (). The divide surrounding Tesla extends beyond consumer preferences into the investment community as well ().

Outline of the Article

This article seeks to explore the perspectives of both supporters and critics from business, investor, and innovation standpoints, with the goal of fostering a deeper understanding on both sides. The discussion will be organized around key areas, including leadership, operations, product lineup, financial performance and stock valuation, and media coverage. The author’s goal is to be comprehensive, balanced and grounded.

Leadership

Elon Musk has become a polarizing figure (), particularly in 2022, when his acquisition of Twitter and subsequent political stances alienated a significant portion of the public and affected perceptions of his companies (). Unlike Steve Jobs, who carefully curated his public persona while often displaying pragmatism and, at times, ruthlessness behind the scenes, Musk presents himself more authentically: brilliant yet socially awkward, blunt, outspoken, driven, and a bold risk-taker ().Musk’s strengths lie in his unparalleled ability to transform innovative, disruptive technologies into large or mega-cap companies, as demonstrated by PayPal, SpaceX, and Tesla (). This track record is arguably unmatched by any contemporary business leader (), driven by his keen sense of technological evolution and adoption, as well as his willingness to take on exceptionally high risks for large rewards.However, Musk’s outspoken nature has proven to be a significant liability. He has faced regulatory challenges, including conflicts and fines from the SEC (), and more recently, has courted controversy by openly endorsing Donald Trump () and engaging in disputes with international leaders via his X.com platform (). Additionally, his heavy involvement with SpaceX has raised concerns about the amount of time he dedicates away from Tesla (). These concerns, raised by critics, are entirely valid and warrant attention in the author’s opinion.Despite these challenges, Musk has a remarkable ability to unite his employees around a singular vision, inspiring them to work long hours and push the boundaries of technological innovation (). His deep technical expertise and willingness to engage directly with employees at all levels provide him with a comprehensive, firsthand understanding of the products his companies develop, grounding the strategies he implements.Within Tesla, the company is supported by top-performing, highly skilled technical leaders in their respective fields (). These leaders build high-functioning departments capable of accomplishing in one year what traditional automakers might require two or three years to achieve (). Even the company’s most ardent critics acknowledge this exceptional level of productivity and innovation ().

Vehicle Manufacturing Operations

Before delving into Tesla’s vehicles, it is essential to first examine the company’s operational model. Tesla has adopted a unique approach within the modern automotive industry by embracing a highly vertically integrated organizational structure. This strategy grants Tesla significant control over all aspects of its business, spanning concept development, design, engineering, manufacturing, implementation, and continuous improvement (B. Benum batxh.com).

For a rapidly growing company developing innovative electric powertrain technologies and managing related advancements, this vertically integrated model is both logical and practical (). However, it also shifts a considerable portion of design responsibility and legal liability onto Tesla. In contrast, other automotive Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) typically rely on their supply chain partners to drive innovation and generate ideas. Additionally, unlike traditional OEMs, Tesla organizes its employees into functional technology groups based on components. For example, powertrain employees (engineers, designers, manufacturing, quality testing, production, and procurement teams) are situated close to each other, reducing inter-departmental communication issues and accelerating the pace of innovation.Conventional horizontal supply chains often result in profit-sharing between the OEM and its partners (). Tesla’s vertical structure, on the other hand, allows the company to retain a larger portion of the profits, enhancing its overall profitability (). It is important to note that horizontal supply chains, with their specialized partners, offer distinct advantages, including expertise, cost efficiency, lower capital outlays, and faster scalability (). However, these benefits come at the cost of reduced control over the final product.Furthermore, Tesla’s non-unionized workforce provides greater operational flexibility compared to traditional automotive OEMs (). This allows for swift changes in production processes, schedules, and job roles without the need for lengthy negotiations or contractual constraints. The absence of union-mandated job classifications, work rules, and union voting fosters a more fluid and collaborative environment, which can enhance creativity and problem-solving and number of patents. While this approach is not without controversy, due to its limitations of employee’s collective bargaining rights, it clearly enables Tesla to innovate and iterate more rapidly than its unionized competitors.Tesla also places significant emphasis on automation and the adoption of new manufacturing processes. In 2018, the company encountered challenges in its attempt to maximize robotic automation in its plants (). However, since then, Tesla has found a balance, minimizing labor while maximizing the quality of work performed by robotics.Lastly, Tesla is introducing a new automotive manufacturing process called “unboxed manufacturing,” which aims to achieve a pseudo-parallelization of the production line (). Elements of this process have already been implemented in the production of the Cybertruck. When fully realized (expected by the end of 2027), this process is projected to increase Tesla’s profit margin per vehicle by 10% to 30% ().The combination of extensive automation, vertically integrated supply chains, non-unionized facilities, and advancements in manufacturing processes is expected to contribute to increase in manufacturing profitability compared to competitors. Given the company’s operational improvements and strong profit margins, Tesla’s critics find it challenging to identify substantial weaknesses.

Tesla’s Mega Pack Storing Energy for a Solar Farm and Power Plant

Tesla’s Products — Energy Storage Market

Tesla revenues are largely split between the power utility energy storage market and automotive vehicles. Power and utility providers primarily acquire Tesla’s Megapacks for electricity energy storage and grid balancing purposes. This technology proves particularly valuable in markets experiencing substantial demand fluctuations due to daily temperature variations, or for customers with significant solar or wind energy installation that require daily storage. As of July 2024, Tesla had deployed 9.4 GWh of storage capacity (), establishing itself as the de facto industry leader with $3 billion in year-to-date revenues, with CATL occupying a distant second place ().Given that battery costs are the primary expense driver in this sector, it is anticipated that major battery manufacturers such as Tesla and China’s CATL and BYD (), leveraging their manufacturing cost advantages, will emerge as dominant players in this market. Critics argue that Chinese suppliers benefit from lower production costs due to labor and localized mineral refining. However, these advantages would be offset by worldwide shipping expenses, and for the us market U.S. import tariffs (), and potential European tariffs (). This author does not see a profitable path for traditional automaker to compete in this market due to the ramp up time and cost to compete in the battery manufacturing market.The energy storage market is projected to reach 512 GWh or $500 billion USD by 2030 (). Currently, Tesla maintains a clear lead, while Chinese competitors are rapidly increasing their market presence ().Finally, Tesla’s charging network, an often overlooked segment of its business, has significant revenue potential following the U.S. automakers’ adoption of the Tesla plug as the universal standard and Tesla’s decision to open its charging network to all EVs. projects this could generate $7 billion in additional revenue to Tesla by 2030.

Tesla Vehicles After a Fresh Rain

Tesla’s Products — Current Vehicles

Tesla’s product portfolio consists entirely of electric vehicles (EVs), currently comprising cars (two models), SUVs (two models), a pickup truck (one model), and semi-trucks (two models). Among these, the Model Y was the global best-seller in 2023 (), with the Model 3 ranking tenth ().Critics argue that while Tesla vehicles are well-regarded, they lack the luxury and aesthetic appeal of recent competitors from BMW, Mercedes, Lucid, Polestar, and Genesis, and so on (). They also correctly note that Tesla’s relative lack of significant exterior and interior design changes in recent releases and apparent stagnation over nearly a decade (). However, these critiques often overlook Tesla’s substantially lower recall rates (), high product quality as reported by owners, and lower total cost of ownership (). Additionally, Tesla’s highly rated mobile application and onboard software contribute significantly to the overall user experience (). Furthermore, Tesla’s autonomous driving AI software (FSD) is expected to bolster the company’s lead when it exits Beta, which is projected for 2025 ().Tesla has explored the possibility of licensing its technology to other automakers, a strategy that could significantly enhance its revenue streams and maximize returns on its initial investments as it can also be used on internal combustion vehicles specifically sedans and SUVs (). The company’s leadership in technological and manufacturing innovations cannot be overstated, as these advancements have consistently driven up per-vehicle profitability while simultaneously improving performance and comfort ().As of August 15, the CyberTruck has become the best-selling pickup truck in the over-$100,000 segment (). Critics and this author concur that its aesthetic is unconventional and unappealing. The vehicle is projected to achieve profitability by 2025 (), and has introduced several technological innovations, steer by wire and 48 volt architecture. Critics accurately note that, given its current manufacturing costs, the CyberTruck is unlikely to penetrate the high-volume affordable or mid-value truck segments (). However, its position as a high-cost, high-profit pickup truck may prove advantageous for Tesla’s bottom line ().

Tesla Semi Truck in a Desert

Semi-Trucks

The Tesla Semi is available in two commercial configurations: a regular cab and a sleeper version (). Currently, Tesla’s production rates for the Semi are low, at an output of approximately five units per week (). The semi-truck market presents unique challenges for electric vehicle adoption, as fleet managers must undertake significant tasks such as upskilling drivers for EV operation, updating maintenance practices and technician training, and installing charging infrastructure at their facilities. These factors, not manufacturing velocity, contribute to a slower and more protracted adoption timelines. Nevertheless, the economic benefits of electric semi-trucks are compelling, with estimated fuel cost savings of roughly $200,000 per vehicle over the first three years of operation (). This will take a decade to playout, and critics are right when they discount this vehicle lines impacts on revenues.

Future Products

Apple does not foreshadow its next-generation products until it is confident in meeting delivery targets. In contrast, Tesla takes a more open approach, exposing itself to criticism when publicly announcing future products in its development pipeline, often accompanied by overly ambitious delivery dates. For institutional analysts who scrutinize missed delivery milestones, this approach is viewed as a significant negative. However, loyal retail investors see tremendous potential in these announcements. Of particular interest are the recent developments in RoboTaxi, Robovan, and Tesla Robots.

Tesla Robot Taxi AI Stylized to a Four Door

Robotaxi

The Robotaxi, potentially marketed to retail customers as a personal autonomous vehicle, depends fully on Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) software capabilities as it has no drivers wheel or peddles. The recently unveiled design highlights Tesla’s ability to manufacture lower-cost electric vehicles (EVs), with a stated Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) of $30,000. This positions Tesla to tap into the ride-hailing and taxi markets currently dominated by companies like Uber and Lyft. In the United States, Uber reported 2023 revenues of $37.2 billion () while Lyft reported $13.8 billion for the same period (). Although Tesla’s Robotaxi business model remains unclear, making it challenging to estimate potential revenues, it is conceivable that within a decade, the company could generate tens billions in revenue from this sector () through directly offering the vehicles, partnering with Uber and Lyft, or some hybrid business model.

Robovan

The Robovan’s unveiling on October 10th drew critical attention due to its apparently minimal ground clearance and look of a train not a road vehicle (). This author believes, based on his decades of engineering experience, that substantial engineering and design modifications are needed to make it competitive in the bus and transport van sectors. This has raised questions about the vehicle’s intended applications and its ultimate market positioning.

A Buffer Version of Tesla Robot

Tesla Robot

Tesla’s humanoid robot represents an entirely new and uncharted product category (BuiltIn.com). Enthusiasts tout its tremendous potential, citing advantages such as the need for smaller manufacturing facilities to produce high volumes of robots opposed to vehicles and the use of significantly smaller battery packs (). Because of this manufacturing ramp-up would be quicker than that of EVs. However, the limiting factor lies in the development of AI software for language processing and spatial interactions, which is still in development and testing.

This author sees initial applications for Tesla Robots in factories, where safety exclusion zones can be established to protect human workers from robotic mishaps. Furthermore, factories have the budgets to purchase dozens of robots focused on high-volume, repetitive, monotonous, and backbreaking tasks. Finally, these facilities have the technical expertise to work through the implementation challenges associated with these new technologies.Now critics, however, could easily challenge the Tesla Robot business model, technology development timelines, and proposed applications of this brand-new technology without much defense from fans. Further, given the unprecedented nature of the Tesla Robot, it is unlikely that institutional analysts would consider it a concrete revenue stream until tangible sales and adoption materialize.

Tesla Stock Prices on a Big Board

Tesla’s Financial Performance and Stock Valuation

Given the extensive analyst coverage and discussions surrounding Tesla’s fair valuation, it is challenging to provide novel insights. Therefore, a summary of the two opposing perspectives is warranted.Cathie Wood’s ARK Invest, a prominent Tesla supporter, along with like-minded analysts, argues that the current period of high inflation, economic uncertainty, and elevated interest rates has exerted downward pressure on the stock since the pandemic (). They anticipate a breakout period when fully autonomous driving is released, CyberTruck sales increase, and global interest rates decrease reducing leasing and finance rates for Tesla’s vehicles ().Critics, on the other hand, cite several shortcomings, including reduced sales due to increased EV competition and weaker-than-expected demand resulting from economic conditions (). Analysts largely discount Tesla’s autonomous technologies, as well as initiatives like Robotaxi and Tesla Bot (). Critics also factor in concerns about Elon Musk’s lack of succession plans (), his increasingly political profile, and potential lack of focus due to his involvement with SpaceX, and X.com, formerly Twitter.While Tesla’s performance ratios are excellent compared to peers (), with increasing profits, critics primarily express concern over the company’s high P/E ratio and lack of mega-growth as seen previously (). Supporters highlight Tesla’s excellent technical teams imbued with Musk’s vision, design ethos, and Tesla’s clear market leadership in energy storage, EVs and semi-trucks, and the potential for their upcoming Robotaxi to dominate the ride-sharing market.The fundamental question for investors becomes one of time horizon: Tesla clearly represents a long-term play. Those with a short-term investment strategy may view the stock differently than those willing to maintain their position over an extended period ().

The Media Covering a Tesla Protest

The Media Views

The centrist and left-leaning media have not been kind to Elon Musk, largely due to his political support of Trump and his acquisition of the traditionally left-leaning Twitter platform (). This negative sentiment has extended to Tesla as well (). The United Auto Workers Union (UAW), which currently is not representing employees in Musk’s plants, wield significant influence in Washington through their lobbying and media efforts. UAWs influence, coupled with the Biden administration’s support for unions, has resulted in Tesla’s odd exclusion from White House-sponsored USA EV leaders’ summit events despite Tesla being a worldwide leader in EVs ().Finally, Tesla with its limited investor relations, marketing, and branding departments, is ill-equipped to counter these pervasive voices with campaigns of its own (). Additionally, Musk’s consistent interviews, in which promised release dates for new products have been repeatedly postponed, have further complicated the situation (). As a result, in the traditional media landscape, the voices and arguments of critics have become the most prominent and persuasive.

Investors

In February 2024, Delaware Judge Kathaleen McCormick denied Elon Musk his executive compensation package of $56 billion, ruling it excessive (). Subsequently, in June 2024, Tesla shareholders voted 63% in favor of reincorporating the company in Texas and reinstating Musk’s pay package (). This development dealt a significant blow to Delaware’s reputation, as it involved a judge overruling a shareholder-ratified compensation plan (). Other CEOs are likely to view Delaware's moves as a potential risk to their own interests ().Nevertheless, this episode demonstrated the overwhelming investor support for Musk and his vision for Tesla’s future (). Despite this backing, short-term investors and short sellers remain prevalent (). The media polarization surrounding Tesla has extended to the investor community, with the company at one point Tesla becoming one of the most heavily shorted stocks in August 2023 ().

Weighting Points from Tesla’s Fan’s and Critics

On the Balance

To summarize, critics are correct in their assessment of CEO Elon Musk’s leadership, suggesting it should be less politically focused and his managerial efforts less divided across his portfolio of companies. However, there is no denying Musk’s technical prowess and willingness to take risks to open new markets and develop disruptive technologies. As well, Tesla’s top management tier is filled with industry-leading experts.Operationally, Tesla’s excellence can be summed up in one metric: their industry-leading profit per vehicle. Currently, they have produced world-favorite EVs by essentially all customer metrics except styling, and their leadership in energy storage solutions is expected to continue and solidify. Their charging network is poised to become North America’s de facto profit leader and generate sustainable, low-risk cash flow.Future products in the pipeline are still discounted, in this authors opinion, correctly by critics due to their immaturity and Tesla’s propensity to extend timelines. The media and UAW are highly biased against Musk and are extending their animosity towards Tesla. Due to limited investor relation and marketing departmental staffing, Tesla is struggling to effectively counter the traditional media’s criticisms.However, the vast majority of Tesla’s investor base seems to support Musk’s vision for the future, voting to reward him and move away from hostile Delaware. Short sellers, motivated by media coverage and their unclear view of Tesla’s future, are looking to make quick profits, and may get burned, as Waren Buffet famously mentioned never short a market leader.Consequently, the conflict between critics and supporters is likely to persist for the next five years. The dispute may not be resolved until Tesla can demonstrate widespread adoption of its autonomous driving software and humanoid robotics technologies.

Comments

I value your feedback and encourage you to engage by clapping, bookmarking, or commenting to help shape our future content. Your support is greatly appreciated. Further, this is not investing advice.

About the Author

Brian Glassman Ph.D.Dr. Brian Glassman, Ph.D., has a background in management and engineering and possesses 20 years of leadership experience in commercializing disruptive technology in enterprise software, having led large engineering and product teams. He is currently the Chief Product Officer for a Generative AI products and consulting firm. An alumnus of Purdue University and Duke University, Dr. Glassman is also a former professor at NYU. Learn more about him at and feel free to connect on . His family members hold a position in Tesla.

Tesla’s Haters & Fans’ Perspectives: A Balanced & Comprehensive View was originally published in Predict on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.